![](/rp/kFAqShRrnkQMbH6NYLBYoJ3lq9s.png)
Nuclear Deterrence | RAND
Feb 22, 2024 · The range of nuclear deterrence strategies includes minimal or "limited" deterrence, massive retaliation with a force greater than that originally used by the aggressor, and mutual assured destruction ("MAD").
Is mutually assured destruction real? : r/NoStupidQuestions
Mutually assured destruction is just an idea -- that if two parties have enough destructive power at their disposal, they could conceivably (read: not certainly and not inevitably) cause significant harm to one another if a conflict broke out, and that that fact can be (read: won't necessarily be in all situations) a deterrent to engaging in ...
Why is mutually assured destruction still a thing?
Mar 14, 2024 · It's not mutual destruction of both militarys, it's mutual destruction of...everything. Russia and China don't have to go toe-to-toe with the US's nuclear arsenal. In a full nuclear exchange there's more than enough to end humanity and civilization as …
By 2040, Artificial Intelligence Could Upend Nuclear Stability
Apr 24, 2018 · Mutual assured destruction thereby encouraged strategic stability by reducing the incentives for either country to take actions that might escalate into a nuclear war. The new RAND paper says that in coming decades, artificial intelligence has the potential to erode the condition of mutual assured destruction and undermine strategic stability.
Is Mutually Assured Destruction still relevant?
Jun 13, 2016 · Is Mutually Assured Destruction still relevant? Yes. It is. The ability to inflict unacceptable losses on in return to an enemy who committed 'first strike' is still alive and well and is the foundation of modern nuclear postures for the west.
r/HFY on Reddit: Mutually Assured Destruction
Feb 20, 2021 · Commander Novak seemed unphased. “That’s the idea. Mutually assured destruction.” The Rensian paused for a moment, considering the situation. “I see we’re at an impasse. I suppose…we could agree to a temporary cease-fire. We’ll withdraw our ships if you’ll do the same.” “Very well.”
CMV: The concept of Mutually Assured Destruction is flawed and …
Aug 7, 2020 · CMV: The concept of Mutually Assured Destruction is flawed and only delays nuclear conflict/disaster instead of preventing it. Delta(s) from OP - Fresh Topic Friday The concept of MAD stems from game theory and essentially argues that two nations with a sufficient and equal stockpile of nuclear weapons will never engage in nuclear war since it ...
r/Polcompball on Reddit: Mutual Assured Destruction
716 votes, 84 comments. 60K subscribers in the Polcompball community. Drawings involving spheroids representing political ideologies…
Cold War,4 it has largely come into vogue afterward, when mutual assured destruction seemed like an anachronism. 5 With the end of the Cold War, policymakers and analysts sought a new term that would offer a more positive framework for defining the strategic nuclear
ELI5: how does MAD work? : r/explainlikeimfive - Reddit
MAD doesnt crumble, it delivers exactly what it promises. Mutually assured destruction. You cannot ignore first strike. Again, thats the whole point. No matter how small first strike is, it must be met by immediate retaliation of equal or greater size. If Russia throws one nuke in Ukraine, no show of force in Ukraine will cut it.