Obscene speech — especially sexually explicit material — is also not protected under the First Amendment. But the legal ...

FDA (2012), however, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit held that these graphic warning labels were impermissible. The court’s reasoning was based on First Amendment protection of ...

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a First Amendment challenge brought by tobacco companies against federally mandated graphic warning labels on cigarette packs, leaving in place a lower ...

A federal appeals court has ruled that the requirement for cigarette packs and advertising to include graphic images demonstrating smoking effects doesn't violate the First Amendment. The ruling ...

I never thought for one moment that I’d actually have to be fearful of law enforcement during a public protest," said one ...

In a previous article in Forefront, we reviewed the cases that have prevented the FDA from implementing graphic warning labels. To briefly recap: The First Amendment protects individual speech as ...

A New Hampshire town's attempt to force a bakery to remove or alter its pastry painting is unconstitutional, a judge ruled.

With less than a month left until the presidential election, Americans across the political spectrum say that their concerns over how their First Amendment rights are protected will influence how ...