A federal judge in Delaware on Tuesday said that a former competitor of Thomson Reuters was not permitted by U.S. copyright law to copy the information and technology company's content to build a ...
Well, well, well—look who suddenly wants a word with the sheriff in the fair-use Wild West landscape of artificial intelligence. As Bloomberg first reported, Microsoft and its partner company ...
The decision in Teradyne v. Astronics illustrates the potential strength of the fair use defense in software cases, even in ...
Judge Bibas’s second take in Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence will get plenty of second looks from courts deciding fair use in generative AI copyright cases. “Highly fact-specific.” ...
Following several rightsholder setbacks in copyright actions against AI developers, Thomson Reuters has scored a major “fair use” victory. That important win arrived in the form of a fresh ...
The Feb. 11 opinion stated that ROSS's use of the copyrighted content, obtained through LegalEase Solutions, was commercial, not transformative, and could not constitute fair use. "There is ...
Among the top reconsiderations in Judge Bibas’ recent decision is his fair use analysis, which now recognizes the non-transformative nature of Ross’ use of copyrighted headnotes that summarize ...
OpenAI hopes for a nation where AI training on copyrighted works counts as fair use — or else, the company says, the US might ...